Recently, the lawyer of King & Capital Law Firm, Liang Yali, was entrusted to form a team of lawyers to defend the client suspected of bribery at the second trial stage, and after unremitting efforts, the court of the second trial ruled to revoke the judgment of the court of the first trial and remanded for retrial.

The client was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment in the first trial for the crime of bribery. He appealed against the original sentence and entrusted Mr. Liang Yali to act as the defender in the second trial. After accepting the commission, the defender rushed to the client's location for communication, and took the initiative to understand the case to the first instance lawyer. Due to the client is in the state of bail, in a comprehensive communication with the client and understand the case, the defender thinks that the first instance judgment factual findings there are many unclear, insufficient evidence. In the subsequent work, the defender has been towards this goal, guiding the client to collect, organize the facts and evidence, and at the same time actively involved in the first trial of another defense lawyer to coordinate and communicate, division of labor and cooperation, to maximize the synergistic role of lawyers.

In the defender to accept the commission, the case file materials have not yet to the court of second instance, the defender has been to the court to follow up the case process, such as the case to the court the first time to the court of second instance to submit the formalities and read the file, the formation of lawyers' opinions, face to face with the judge to communicate. Through reading the file found that the first instance failed to comprehensively access to evidence, for the key facts of the amount of bribe is not clear, the evidence is not sufficient, and there are procedural violations. Accordingly, the defense submitted to the court to retrieve evidence application, lawyer's opinion, as well as case search report, through face-to-face and telephone and other forms of communication with the judge of the second trial.

The judge of the second instance, on the basis of listening to the opinions of the lawyers, conscientiously perform their duties, strict control, and finally the court of the second instance to make the decision of remanding the case for retrial. The lawyer's active defense and the second instance judge's role as a bearer of responsibility won a valuable retrial opportunity for the client, and the defense work has achieved stage-by-stage results!