Recently, Zhang Deshan lawyer acting on behalf of the amount of more than 40 million, victims of more than 600 people, the loss of a total of more than 20 million illegal absorption of public deposits of the case of the first trial judgement, Zhang Deshan lawyers through the development of scientific defense program, the use of good communication skills, after several rounds of court hearings, the parties in the three years of bail pending trial, although the amount of the crime ranked high among the ten co-defendants, but get the lowest sentence, the final verdict was sentenced to one year imprisonment, suspended for one year and a penalty of RMB 60,000 yuan. He was finally sentenced to one year of imprisonment, one year of probation and a fine of RMB 60,000 yuan for the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits, which was the lowest sentence among the ten co-defendants and the one that obtained the best result. The client and his family highly praised Zhang Deshan for his serious and responsible defense work.

I. Situation of the case

The number of people involved in this case, the victims and the amount of money involved in the case, the relationship between the various people intricate, across different regions, the case file materials. Zhang Deshan lawyer in accepting the commission, immediately carefully study the case file materials, in the defense of this case in three years time, many meetings, to understand the details of the case to the person concerned, actively collect evidence from the relevant people, face to face with the prosecutor, the judge to communicate with the defense, and based on this has written a number of legal documents, many times to submit a written defense as well as supplemental defense opinions.

Second, the focus of the case

Mr. Zhang Deshan combined with his own profound legal knowledge, comprehensively analyzed the facts and evidence of the case, the status and role of the client, especially after carefully reviewing more than a hundred case files, repeatedly comparing the audit report, and questioning the professional auditors, he objected to the amount of money involved in the case determined by the prosecuting authority, and assisted the authorities in clearing up the facts of the case, and reduced the amount of money of the defendant found to have illegally absorbed the deposits of the public, and obtained a reduction of the amount of money for the client in the stage of the prosecutor's office. stage, and secured a half-reduced sentencing recommendation for his client. Mr. Zhang Deshan was also the only lawyer who suggested that the division of the case into multiple courts was for the sake of procedural convenience and should not affect the determination of the objective facts of the case. Due to the special characteristics of the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits, where the victims are numerous and widely distributed, the case is usually heard in multiple courts around the world, and these split cases are essentially the same case, but are heard in different courts for the sake of trial convenience. Therefore, for the chairman of the defendant tried in foreign courts, the client is only to help the role of accessories, and should not be recognized as the main offender.

With his rich experience in criminal defense, Mr. Zhang Deshan found effective arguments for his client to mitigate the punishment, which greatly reduced the client's sentence. In the court trial stage, Zhang Deshan lawyer also for the client to get the surrender of the mitigating circumstances. In the end, the court sentenced him to a lighter sentence than the prosecutor's recommendation, and compared with the other nine co-defendants, he received the lowest sentence and achieved the best defense effect.

Third, the lawyer summarized

Defense lawyers should not only from the facts, but also from the evidence, but also from experience, using their own professional and responsible work attitude, meticulous work style, sincere and open communication, do not let go of any detail, at the same time, to boldly question, with the courage to overcome the difficulties, in order to maximize the maintenance of the client's legitimate rights and interests of the best efforts.