Recently, Mr. Tang Jianbin, a senior partner of Beijing King&Capital Law Firm, received a ruling of the Supreme People's Court on the non-approval of the death penalty in the case of Xiao's intentional homicide. Through the professional and meticulous defense of Mr. Tang, the Supreme People's Court ruled that the death penalty of Xiao was not approved, and the case was sent back to the Guangdong Provincial High People's Court for a new trial.

The first and second trial court judgment of the case found that on February 21, 2018, xiao moumou in shantou city longhu district, a bar because of trifles with others after the conflict, holding a knife, causing one death and one injury, and intentional homicide sentenced xiao moumou death penalty for immediate execution, according to the law, the supreme people's court of the case of xiao moumou death penalty review.

In the supreme people's court during the death penalty review, xiao moumou's family entrusted Beijing king&Capital law firm's Tang Jianbin lawyer as a defender. Tang Jianbin met with the defendant, carefully examined the case related evidence and materials, conducted a comprehensive study of the case, that the case in the factual findings and evidence of the existence of a number of doubts and controversial points, on this basis put forward a reasoned defense opinions, at the same time, I implore the death penalty review judge combined with Xiao Moumou has the initiative to surrender, active compensation and other mitigating circumstances, not to approve the death penalty Xiao Moumou.

After many times with the death penalty review judge to communicate the defense, finally, the supreme people's court on the case according to law, not approved the death penalty, sent back to the guangdong provincial high people's court for retrial of the death penalty review ruling.