A few days ago, a business executive was criminally detained and approved for arrest on suspicion of bribing a non-State official. In this case, the executive was suspected of giving bribes to a number of people related to the business chain, and the case was relatively complicated. After the intervention of Mr. Li Zhiguang and Mr. Ning Yu, through meticulous investigation and efficient communication, the facts of the case were finally determined to be unit bribery, and only a single bribe was paid to a single person. Procuratorate in the review and prosecution stage to change the coercive measures for bail pending trial, the parties were able to go home to reunite.

　　I. The facts of the case are complex, and

 the person concerned is suspected of having committed multiple acts of bribery

 In August 2024, the person concerned in this case was criminally detained on suspicion of having paid a bribe to the docking officer of the purchasing department of a large company, and the amount has been found to be relatively large. The case involves many company subjects, a long time span, complex personnel relations, suspected of multiple bribery by multiple people, the facts of the conviction have not been able to find out, and finally approved the arrest.

　　After accepting the commission of the family, Li Zhiguang and Ning Yu met with the client at the first time to understand the case and formulate the defense strategy.

　　Second, to determine the conviction, locking unit bribery facts

 Li Zhiguang, Ning Yu lawyers through multiple meetings with the client, and the case unit communication, to understand the core reasons for the arrest of the client was approved, accurately grasp the future node of the case towards easing the client and his family's agitation.

　　At the same time, the two lawyers focus on the case there is documentary evidence of a single bribe evidence, agreed that the fact should be recognized as a unit of bribery. On this basis, actively communicate with the case unit, suggesting that the parties to a lighter penalty.

　　Third, combing the silk cocoon, exclude redundant suspicion

 for the person suspected of more than one bribe facts, lawyers one by one to verify the documentary records in the case, to confirm that the person in charge of the flow of funds, compared with the relevant personnel involved in the case of witness testimony, successfully constructed the person with the rest of the bribery case has nothing to do with the defense of the system of evidence.

　　At this point, the case met the conditions for changing the criminal coercive measures stipulated in Article 579 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure of the People's Procuratorate, and after repeated communication with the organizing prosecutor, the procuratorial authorities finally decided to change the coercive measures for the person concerned to be released on bail pending trial, and the person concerned was successfully reunited with his family.

　　Fourth, continue to follow up the case, expanding the results of the defense

 Procuratorial authorities in the act of active and passive bribery as a whole to grasp the environment, recognized the lawyer's defense claim, confirmed that this case belongs to the unit bribery case, confirmed the existence of the person concerned to confess, plead guilty to the penalty, the full refund of stolen goods and restitution, and other mitigating circumstances, and decided that the person concerned with the optimal penalty processing.