Recently, in the case of illegal absorption of public deposits undertaken by King&Capital Law Firm's Yun Insignia Feng and Yingying Rao's trainee lawyers, the lawyer team regained the client's freedom after being detained for 87 days after several rounds of communication and unremitting efforts.
I. Basic Information of the Case
At the beginning of July, 2025, the client Huang was taken criminal compulsory measures because the company he worked for was suspected of illegally absorbing public deposits. According to the party's family, the company that the party worked for was investigated and tried for the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits as early as 2019, and the main members of the company's management, including the boss, had been sentenced according to the law. The sudden recourse after six years put Huang and his family in panic and anxiety. Recommended by friends and relatives, Huang's family found lawyer Feng Yun Insignia at the first time, and the two sides established a client relationship after the interview.
Strong Attitude and Obstructed Communication
After accepting the entrustment, Lawyer Feng met with the client several times, organized the materials, and analyzed the case comprehensively, and found that in addition to the high amount of money involved in the case (more than 16 million yuan) and the high amount of illegal proceeds (more than 2 million yuan), the case also had objective difficulties, such as the management of the company had already served their sentences and the public security authorities had already had experience in the investigation of the case. For the above difficulties, Feng lawyer around three aspects of the public security organs to maintain communication: first, Huang only for the company salesman, did not serve as a management position or in the core positions, does not have the management authority, and does not know the company's specific mode of operation, just accept the instructions of the superior to carry out the ground push publicity work, not involved in the follow-up of the product promotion and signing of the contract, in this case play a smaller role; second, Huang does not have the relevant experience in financial business. Have financial business related experience, training experience, professional background, and the company's products many times through the authoritative public media and other channels to publicize, the party lacks the corresponding ability to judge; Third, Huang and his relatives are also victims, a total of nearly four million yuan invested in the company's principal, to the company's discovery there are still most of the failure to redeem, the subjective harmfulness of the lower.
However, with the public security organs in the process of communication, the contractor has always been a tough attitude, refused to details of the case and lawyers to carry out in-depth exchanges, many times to report the arrest and then communicate with the prosecutor for the reason of shirking, and emphasized that the case because of the crowd, the amount involved in a huge amount of money, by the bureau of investigation and unity of the contractor, the specific police officers have no right to decide alone. The client was detained for fifteen days, Feng submitted to the public security organs of the “application for bail pending trial”, the public security organs really did not grant permission.
After the case reported for approval of arrest, Feng lawyer the first time to get in touch with the contractor prosecutor, communicate the case, timely submission of “on the decision not to approve the arrest of the lawyer's opinion”, again around the above three aspects of the problem put forward detailed lawyer's opinion. Regrettably, the prosecutor's attitude is tougher, in the communication repeatedly emphasized that although huang mou is only salesman, but the amount of money and the amount of illegal income are higher, do not meet the conditions of bail, and in the 34th day after huang mou was detained to make the decision to arrest. After understanding, the case of some of the same businessman has not been arrested, can be seen in the prosecutor's office of Huang's characterization of the relatively heavier, the communication situation is not optimistic.
Third, unremitting, repeated communication
After the arrest decision, Feng did not stop efforts, on the one hand, maintain the frequency of meeting every two weeks, through the meeting of the timely notification of the case progress, encourage Huang to establish confidence, on the other hand, keep in close contact with the family, guide its investigation and evidence collection, supplement the investor's letter of understanding, bank water, contracts and other case materials, but also maintain close communication with the prosecutor.
Detained for about 80 days, Feng lawyer in the meeting from the client HuangMou mouth, the public security organs in the arraignment clearly informed that the investigation work has been basically completed, will be transferred to the procuratorate at the end of the month for examination and prosecution. At this time, the detention period has been longer, the case will be transferred to the examination and prosecution, change the coercive measures can be difficult. In the face of the sudden unfavorable changes, Feng's team did not give up, and finally formed a 161-page “Application for Review of the Necessity of Detention” and six attachments after comprehensively sorting out the case materials. Within a week after the application materials submitted to the Procuratorate, Feng and the prosecutor on the bail conditions, compensation and understanding, refund of compensation and other issues to carry out multiple rounds of communication and exchange, and strive to soften the prosecutor's tough attitude towards the case.
Fourth, before the festival, to be reunited with bail
After many rounds of communication, the procuratorate finally adopted the lawyer's opinion, on September 30th, according to the law to make a decision on bail pending trial. After 87 days of detention, the party concerned regained his freedom, and was able to return home on the eve of the double festival, and family reunion, celebrate the festival.
The success of the bail pending trial is not only the reflection of Feng's solid professional ability, efficient communication ability and case analysis ability, but also the embodiment of the judiciary's “leniency and severity” criminal policy and the spirit of humanistic care. After that, Feng's team will continue to uphold King&Capital Law Firm's professional philosophy of “pursuing excellence and fulfilling the trust”, and safeguard the client's legitimate rights and interests in accordance with the law.
