In February 2024, Mr. Jiang, a client located in Kunming, was criminally detained by the public security authorities for a suspected fraud case involving his company. Afterwards, Jiang's family entrusted our lawyers Feng Yun-insan and Yang Haiming to act as his defense. After accepting the commission, Mr. Feng Yun-insan and Mr. Yang Haiming started to handle the case in an off-site mode. After effective defense, Jiang was ranked sixth among the eleven defendants in the case, and was eventually sentenced to the lowest sentence in the case, which was reduced from over ten years' imprisonment to three years' imprisonment, and the client and his family fully approved of the defense work of the legal team.

When the case was first transferred for review and prosecution, the public security organs determined that jiang mou involved in the amount of more than two hundred thousand yuan, jiang mou said he is willing to refund the full amount of personal profit. Accordingly, the lawyer communicated with the prosecutor, the prosecutor had indicated that the relative non-prosecution can be considered. After the case returned to supplementary investigation, the public security organs to further add evidence, Jiangmou involved in the amount rose to more than two million yuan, the prosecutor's initial sentencing recommendations adjusted to more than ten years, after the contractor's repeated communication, the lawyer emphasized that Jiangmou's behavior should be recognized as an accessory to mitigate the punishment, the prosecutor adopted the lawyer's opinion, Jiangmou's sentencing recommendations down to four years or so.

Through reading the file and meeting, Feng and Yang found that the indictment found that Jiang's work time is inconsistent with the actual situation. The indictment found that Jiang was absent from Kunming for nearly 20 days out of the two months he worked at the company in question. Contractor lawyers as a breakthrough point, guiding the family to collect relevant evidence, to the Procuratorate submitted a written opinion, requesting re-verification of the amount of money involved in the case of Jiang Mou, and for this reason again with the prosecutor to communicate sentencing recommendations. After verification, the amount of Jiangmou involved in the case down to more than 1.9 million yuan, and the prosecutor said he could consider appropriate reduction of the sentence, but did not commit to probation or three years of imprisonment.

After the court issued a notice of trial, the lawyer on the plea of guilty and acceptance of punishment with the prosecutor for further communication, the prosecutor proposed in the plea of guilty and acceptance of punishment, return of stolen goods and restitution based on the sentencing recommendations can be adjusted to three years and six months, and determine in the trial before signing the "plea of guilty and acceptance of punishment. The day before the trial, the lawyer made another appointment to meet with the prosecutor and interviewed him about the sentence, and eventually the prosecutor agreed to adjust the sentencing recommendation to three years' imprisonment, stating that the sentencing recommendation was the lowest among the 11 defendants in the same case. Subsequently, the lawyer informed the client of the communication during the meeting and made a detailed analysis on whether to plead guilty and continue to fight for probation, and the client decided to sign the Plea and Guilty Plea Agreement after consideration. Through the trial, the court finally sentenced Jiang to the minimum sentence - three years of imprisonment, the amount of fine is also in a reasonable range.

It is worth mentioning that on the day of the trial, the judge left a rare communication time for the defendant and his family after the trial, and those whose family members were not present were allowed to use the lawyer's phone to talk to their family members for a short time, which is a direct reflection of the judicial temperature and humanistic care.

The case from March 2024 to November 2025 to accept the commission of the first instance verdict, lasted one year and eight months, the lawyer a total of twelve times to and from Kunming, met with the client fourteen times, including the national day of the day of the meeting. The successful defense of this case is not only the professional ability of King&Capital Law Firm lawyers and dedication to the concentration of the spirit of embodiment, but also lawyers through the effective defense of the client's legitimate rights and interests of the vivid practice. Through this case again proved that the professional criminal defense is to guard the individual rights, promote justice, realize the “efforts to let the people in every judicial case feel fair and just” the goal of the indispensable power.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)